Am Dienstag, den 06.11.2018, 11:14 -0500 schrieb Ilia Mirkin: > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:27 AM Gert Wollny <gert.wol...@collabora.co > m> wrote: > I'm not as intimately familiar with GLES extensions / features, but > would EXT_sRGB be the extension that covers that support? The extension has the status "not complete" but after reading is it seems to describe what is needed from ARB_framebuffer_sRGB in GLES 3.0, so yes, I'll look into doing that, but given the "not complete" state I'm not sure whether it is worth the trouble to exposed it with GLES 2.0 or just use it as a vehicle to do the versioning for GLES 3.0 right.
> Mesa does not presently implement this extension, but if it's the > right one, perhaps adding an implementation of that, and then doing > something like > > EXT_sRGB = is_format_supported(SRGB) > EXT_framebuffer_sRGB / ARB_framebuffer_sRGB / EXT_sRGB_write_control > = > is_format_supported(SRGB) && > !PIPE_CAP_REQUIRE_SURFACE_RESOURCE_FORMAT_MATCH > GLES3 = EXT_sRGB (& others, obviously) I have no strong opinion on this but my gut tells me to agree with Marek: a non-negative cap seems better the me for following the logic that "EXT_framebuffer_sRGB/.. = is_format_supported(sRGB) + something", only the naming of that "something" should be somehow intuitive. Best, Gert _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
