Kevin, Your email messages are missing the in-reply-to header, making this thread completely incomprehensible on the mailing list.
Please fix your mail client to include the standard headers so we can follow what you are saying. -Mark "Rogovin, Kevin" <kevin.rogo...@intel.com> writes: > Hi, > >> Having the same underlying compiler intrinsic and having the same behavior >> are not the same thing. The INTEL extension allows strictly more >> functionality than the ARB extension so it needs even more testing. In >> particular, it allows you to do the barrier in non-uniform control-flow >> which is a very different thing than at the top of a shader like is allowed >> by ARB_fragment_shader_interlock. I expect the INTEL extension to need >> substantially more testing than the ARB one. > > Just an FYI: the Mesa implementation for the ARB (and thus NV) > extension accept shaders where the begin function takes place inside > of control flow actually. > > -Kevin > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
