Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> writes: > If you don't have HW to do bfi, then lowering bitfieldInsert to bfi makes > things harder than keeping the "bits" argument around. > > This still uses bfm, but I've added the obvious lowering of bfm if you > need it.
Anyone? Even just an ack, assuming that I'm passing the test suites.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
