On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:05:51PM -0800, Dylan Baker wrote:
> Quoting Thierry Reding (2018-02-23 05:18:28)
> > From: Thierry Reding <tred...@nvidia.com>
> > 
> > The disk cache implementation uses 64-bit atomic operations. For some
> > architectures, such as 32-bit ARM, GCC will not be able to translate
> > these operations into lock-free instructions and will instead rely on
> > the external atomics library to provide these operations.
> > 
> > Check at configuration time whether or not linking against libatomic
> > is necessary and if so, create a dependency that can be used while
> > linking the mesautil library.
> > 
> > This is the meson equivalent of 2ef7f23820a6 ("configure: check if
> > -latomic is needed for __atomic_*").
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <tred...@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> >  meson.build          | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >  src/util/meson.build |  2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
> > index 121341a950c4..7c6f40573421 100644
> > --- a/meson.build
> > +++ b/meson.build
> > @@ -800,6 +800,21 @@ endif
> >  if cc.compiles('int main() { int n; return __atomic_load_n(&n, 
> > __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE); }',
> >                 name : 'GCC atomic builtins')
> >    pre_args += '-DUSE_GCC_ATOMIC_BUILTINS'
> > +
> > +  # Not all atomic calls can be turned into lock-free instructions, in 
> > which
> > +  # GCC will make calls into the libatomic library. Check whether we need 
> > to
> > +  # link with -latomic.
> > +  #
> > +  # This can happen for 64-bit atomic operations on 32-bit architectures 
> > such
> > +  # as ARM.
> > +  if not cc.links('''#include <stdint.h>
> > +                     int main() {
> > +                       uint64_t n;
> > +                       return (int)__atomic_load_n(&n, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
> > +                     }''',
> > +                  name : 'GCC atomic builtins required -latomic')
> > +    dep_atomic = cc.find_library('atomic')
> 
> dep_atomic is undefined if the cc.links() succeeds right?

Yeah, I noticed that too when building on 64-bit ARM and then forgot to
send out v2. I'll do that shortly. The fix, though I'm not sure if it's
the correct way to do it in Meson, is to declare dep_atomic as an empty
dependency:

        dep_atomic = declare_dependency()

unconditionally and then overwrite it with the proper dependency after
libatomic was detected.

Any ideas if this can be done more idiomatically?

Thierry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to