On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Jose Maria Casanova Crespo < jmcasan...@igalia.com> wrote:
> SSBO loads were using byte_scattered read messages as they allow > reading 16-bit size components. byte_scattered messages can only > operate one component at a time so we needed to emit as many messages > as components. > > But for vec2 and vec4 of 16-bit, being multiple of 32-bit we can use the > untyped_surface_read message to read pairs of 16-bit components using only > one message. Once each pair is read it is unshuffled to return the proper > 16-bit components. > > On 16-bit scalar and vec3 16-bit the not paired component is read using > only one byte_scattered_read message. > My gut tells me that, for vec3's, we'd be better off with a single untyped read than one untyped read and one byte scattered read. Also, are there alignment issues with untyped surface reads/writes that might cause us problems on vec3's? I don't know what the alignment rules are for 16-bit vec3's in Vulkan. > v2: Removed use of stride = 2 on sources (Jason Ekstrand) > Rework optimization using unshuffle 16 reads (Chema Casanova) > --- > src/intel/compiler/brw_fs_nir.cpp | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > --------- > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs_nir.cpp > b/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs_nir.cpp > index fa7aa9c247..57e79853ef 100644 > --- a/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs_nir.cpp > +++ b/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs_nir.cpp > @@ -2354,16 +2354,39 @@ do_untyped_vector_read(const fs_builder &bld, > bld.ADD(read_offset, read_offset, brw_imm_ud(16)); > } > } else if (type_sz(dest.type) == 2) { > - fs_reg read_offset = bld.vgrf(BRW_REGISTER_TYPE_UD); > - bld.MOV(read_offset, offset_reg); > - for (unsigned i = 0; i < num_components; i++) { > - fs_reg read_reg = emit_byte_scattered_read(bld, surf_index, > read_offset, > - 1 /* dims */, > - 1, > - 16 /*bit_size */, > - BRW_PREDICATE_NONE); > - bld.MOV(offset(dest,bld,i), subscript(read_reg, dest.type, 0)); > - bld.ADD(read_offset, read_offset, brw_imm_ud(type_sz(dest.type)) > ); > + assert(dest.stride == 1); > + > + int component_pairs = num_components / 2; > + /* Pairs of 16-bit components can be read with untyped read */ > + if (component_pairs > 0) { > + fs_reg read_result = emit_untyped_read(bld, surf_index, > + offset_reg, > + 1 /* dims */, > + component_pairs, > + BRW_PREDICATE_NONE); > + shuffle_32bit_load_result_to_16bit_data(bld, > + retype(dest, BRW_REGISTER_TYPE_HF), > + retype(read_result, BRW_REGISTER_TYPE_F), > I'd rather we use W and D rather than HF and F. Rounding errors scare me. > + component_pairs * 2); > + } > + /* Last component of vec3 and scalar 16-bit read needs to be read > + * using one byte_scattered_read message > + */ > + if (num_components % 2) { > + fs_reg read_offset = bld.vgrf(BRW_REGISTER_TYPE_UD); > + bld.ADD(read_offset, > + offset_reg, > + brw_imm_ud((num_components - 1) * type_sz(dest.type))); > + fs_reg read_result = emit_byte_scattered_read(bld, surf_index, > + read_offset, > + 1 /* dims */, > + 1, > + 16 /* bit_size */, > + > BRW_PREDICATE_NONE); > + read_result.type = dest.type; > + read_result.stride = 2; > + > + bld.MOV(offset(dest, bld, num_components - 1), read_result); > } > } else { > unreachable("Unsupported type"); > -- > 2.14.3 > > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev >
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev