On 18/10/17 05:41 PM, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 17 October 2017 at 15:39, Andy Furniss <adf.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Emil Velikov wrote: >> >>>>> On a "bad" build (-DLLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON) I get >>>>> >>>>> andy [~]$ llvm-config --link-shared --libs bitwriter >>>>> llvm-config: error: missing: /usr/lib/libLLVMDemangle.so >>>>> llvm-config: error: missing: /usr/lib/libLLVMSupport.so >>>>> llvm-config: error: missing: /usr/lib/libLLVMBinaryFormat.so >>>>> llvm-config: error: missing: /usr/lib/libLLVMCore.so >>>>> llvm-config: error: missing: /usr/lib/libLLVMBitReader.so >>>>> llvm-config: error: missing: /usr/lib/libLLVMMC.so >>>>> llvm-config: error: missing: /usr/lib/libLLVMMCParser.so >>>>> llvm-config: error: missing: /usr/lib/libLLVMObject.so >>>>> llvm-config: error: missing: /usr/lib/libLLVMProfileData.so >>>>> llvm-config: error: missing: /usr/lib/libLLVMAnalysis.so >>>>> llvm-config: error: missing: /usr/lib/libLLVMBitWriter.so >>> >>> >>> These here indicate that something in LLVM broke. Please report it >>> ASAP so that we don't get a LLVM release with this bug. >> >> >> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34977 >> > Great, thank you. In the interim please use the LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB > workaround. > Just checked LLVM 5.0 w/o LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB - seems to also be > broken in the same way. > > Considering distributions (checked Fedora, Arch, Ubuntu and Debian) > toggle both BUILD and LINK together, I'm inclined to keep things > as-is.
Right, I'd recommend enabling LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB anyway when LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB is enabled. Is there any particular reason for enabling the latter but not the former? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
