On 17 October 2017 at 15:39, Andy Furniss <adf.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Emil Velikov wrote: > >>>> On a "bad" build (-DLLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=ON) I get >>>> >>>> andy [~]$ llvm-config --link-shared --libs bitwriter >>>> llvm-config: error: missing: /usr/lib/libLLVMDemangle.so >>>> llvm-config: error: missing: /usr/lib/libLLVMSupport.so >>>> llvm-config: error: missing: /usr/lib/libLLVMBinaryFormat.so >>>> llvm-config: error: missing: /usr/lib/libLLVMCore.so >>>> llvm-config: error: missing: /usr/lib/libLLVMBitReader.so >>>> llvm-config: error: missing: /usr/lib/libLLVMMC.so >>>> llvm-config: error: missing: /usr/lib/libLLVMMCParser.so >>>> llvm-config: error: missing: /usr/lib/libLLVMObject.so >>>> llvm-config: error: missing: /usr/lib/libLLVMProfileData.so >>>> llvm-config: error: missing: /usr/lib/libLLVMAnalysis.so >>>> llvm-config: error: missing: /usr/lib/libLLVMBitWriter.so >> >> >> These here indicate that something in LLVM broke. Please report it >> ASAP so that we don't get a LLVM release with this bug. > > > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34977 > Great, thank you. In the interim please use the LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB workaround. Just checked LLVM 5.0 w/o LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB - seems to also be broken in the same way.
Considering distributions (checked Fedora, Arch, Ubuntu and Debian) toggle both BUILD and LINK together, I'm inclined to keep things as-is. Skimming through strace, I've noticed that llvm-config _always_ checks for: -- with --link-shared libLLVM-$version.so - correct libLLVM$component.so - wrong, should be removed The above two should be swapped if BUILD_SHARED_LIBS is set -- with --link-static libLLVM-$version.so - wrong, should be removed libLLVM$component.a - correct Thanks Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
