On 2 August 2017 at 21:24, Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > The device extension string is expected to contain the name of the > extension defining what kind of device it is, so the caller can know > what kinds of operations it can perform with it. So that string had > better be non-empty, hence this trivial extension. > Is there something that forbids a EGL device to advertise an empty string? I don't recall such text.
Regardless, I think this (esp. combined with the extension in 3/3) is a good idea. One minor suggestion below. > +Overview > + > + This extension defines a software EGL "device". The device is not backed > by > + any actual device node and simply renders into client memory. > + > + By defining this as an extension, EGL_EXT_device_enumeration is able to > + sanely enumerate a software fallback device. > + Drop "fallback"? Despite how crazy it sounds it's not impossible to have a system with only software device(s). Hopefully we won't see too many. Thanks Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
