On 29 June 2017 at 16:38, Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> wrote: > Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Hi Eric, >> >> On 29 June 2017 at 02:15, Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> wrote: >>> Needing to get our uapi header from libdrm has only complicated things. >>> Follow intel's lead and drop our requirement for it. >>> >> UAPI: I think I may have noticed some compat breakage here. >> >> The sizeof above struct will differ across 32/64bit builds and since >> it's embedded below I doubt one can change it now. > > Why are you reviewing the existing UAPI in this patch? It's UAPI. Yes, UAPI cannot be broken/changed.
Guess I'm just naive enough, trying to help before corruption and/or crashes occur. If you've already sorted that - pardon for the noise. A simple - "It's already addressed" would have been appreciated. -Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
