Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi Eric, > > On 29 June 2017 at 02:15, Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> wrote: >> Needing to get our uapi header from libdrm has only complicated things. >> Follow intel's lead and drop our requirement for it. >> > UAPI: I think I may have noticed some compat breakage here. > > The sizeof above struct will differ across 32/64bit builds and since > it's embedded below I doubt one can change it now.
Why are you reviewing the existing UAPI in this patch? It's UAPI.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
