On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 04:06:34PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Nanley Chery <nanleych...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Nanley Chery <nanley.g.ch...@intel.com> > > --- > > src/intel/blorp/blorp_clear.c | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/src/intel/blorp/blorp_clear.c b/src/intel/blorp/blorp_clear.c > > index 3d5c41cc71..f43d05ad19 100644 > > --- a/src/intel/blorp/blorp_clear.c > > +++ b/src/intel/blorp/blorp_clear.c > > @@ -308,6 +308,10 @@ blorp_fast_clear(struct blorp_batch *batch, > > uint32_t level, uint32_t start_layer, uint32_t > > num_layers, > > uint32_t x0, uint32_t y0, uint32_t x1, uint32_t y1) > > { > > + /* Multi-layer and multi-LOD fast clear is only available gen8+. */ > > + assert(ISL_DEV_GEN(batch->blorp->isl_dev) >= 8 || > > + (level == 0 && start_layer + num_layers == 1)); > > > > Alternatively, you could just add code to patch 1 which asserts that the > level/layer is in-bounds for the auxiliary surface if one exists. > >
I think your suggestion complements, but doesn't replace this patch. Your suggestion validates the level and start_layer parameters. This patch validates those parameters as well as the num_layers parameter. > > + > > struct blorp_params params; > > blorp_params_init(¶ms); > > params.num_layers = num_layers; > > -- > > 2.13.1 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > mesa-dev mailing list > > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev > > _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev