On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Samuel Pitoiset
<samuel.pitoi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 06/14/2017 08:24 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Samuel Pitoiset
>> <samuel.pitoi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoi...@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> src/util/u_dynarray.h | 6 ++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/util/u_dynarray.h b/src/util/u_dynarray.h
>>> index 57f96ff79c0..cc316323f28 100644
>>> --- a/src/util/u_dynarray.h
>>> +++ b/src/util/u_dynarray.h
>>> @@ -68,6 +68,12 @@ util_dynarray_fini(struct util_dynarray *buf)
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static inline void
>>> +util_dynarray_clear(struct util_dynarray *buf)
>>
>>
>> util_dynarray_init? "clear" sounds like "free".
>>
>
> There is already util_dynarray_init(), but it resets all fields to 0
> including 'capacity', same for util_dynarray_fini().
>
> The idea behind util_dynarray_clear() is to avoid extra reallocations.
>
> Though, the number of color/depth textures which need decompression is most
> likely small, so using util_dynarray_fini() shouldn't impact too much. What
> do you think?
"clear" sounds good then.
Marek
>
>
>> Marek
>>
>>> +{
>>> + buf->size = 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> #define DYN_ARRAY_INITIAL_SIZE 64
>>>
>>> /* use util_dynarray_trim to reduce the allocated storage */
>>> --
>>> 2.13.1
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mesa-dev mailing list
>>> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
