---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_bufmgr.c | 14 +-------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_bufmgr.c
b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_bufmgr.c
index 4ab72cd..15610db 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_bufmgr.c
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_bufmgr.c
@@ -772,19 +772,7 @@ brw_bo_map_gtt(struct brw_context *brw, struct brw_bo *bo,
unsigned flags)
void *
brw_bo_map_unsynchronized(struct brw_context *brw, struct brw_bo *bo)
{
- struct brw_bufmgr *bufmgr = bo->bufmgr;
-
- /* If the CPU cache isn't coherent with the GTT, then use a
- * regular synchronized mapping. The problem is that we don't
- * track where the buffer was last used on the CPU side in
- * terms of brw_bo_map_cpu vs brw_bo_map_gtt, so
- * we would potentially corrupt the buffer even when the user
- * does reasonable things.
- */
- if (!bufmgr->has_llc)
- return brw_bo_map_gtt(brw, bo, MAP_READ | MAP_WRITE);
- else
- return brw_bo_map_gtt(brw, bo, MAP_READ | MAP_WRITE | MAP_ASYNC);
+ return brw_bo_map_gtt(brw, bo, MAP_READ | MAP_WRITE | MAP_ASYNC);
}
static bool
--
2.10.2
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
