Yes, that is correct. I wasn't thinking clearly. On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 1:57 PM Christian König <deathsim...@vodafone.de> wrote:
> Am 03.04.2017 um 06:35 schrieb Shaleen Jain: > > --- > > src/gallium/state_trackers/omx/vid_dec.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/src/gallium/state_trackers/omx/vid_dec.c > b/src/gallium/state_trackers/omx/vid_dec.c > > index 9a6efb8e28..94664eba04 100644 > > --- a/src/gallium/state_trackers/omx/vid_dec.c > > +++ b/src/gallium/state_trackers/omx/vid_dec.c > > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ > > #include <OMX_Video.h> > > > > /* bellagio defines a DEBUG macro that we don't want */ > > -#ifndef DEBUG > > +#ifdef DEBUG > > NAK, the logic locked correct as it was before. > > Why do you want to invert it? > > Regards, > Christian. > > > #include <bellagio/omxcore.h> > > #undef DEBUG > > #else > > >
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
