Thank you, please, could you push them too? I don't have commit access.
On 28.03.2017 22:36, Marek Olšák wrote:
> Actually nevermind.
>
> Patches 1-3:
> Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.ol...@amd.com>
>
> Patches 4-5:
> These have no effect, because r600g hw doesn't use TC for index fetches.
>
> Marek
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> BTW, I don't know if tcc_cache_line_size has the correct value for
>> pre-GCN chips.
>>
>> Marek
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Constantine Kharlamov
>> <hi-an...@yandex.ru> wrote:
>>> Stolen from radeonsi
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Constantine Kharlamov <hi-an...@yandex.ru>
>>> ---
>>> src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_state_common.c | 3 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_state_common.c
>>> b/src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_state_common.c
>>> index 961e04e9db..5293c4034f 100644
>>> --- a/src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_state_common.c
>>> +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_state_common.c
>>> @@ -1766,7 +1766,8 @@ static void r600_draw_vbo(struct pipe_context *ctx,
>>> const struct pipe_draw_info
>>> info->instance_count > 1 ||
>>> info->count*ib.index_size
>>> > 20)) {
>>> u_upload_data(ctx->stream_uploader, 0,
>>> - info->count * ib.index_size, 256,
>>> + info->count * ib.index_size,
>>> +
>>> rctx->screen->b.info.tcc_cache_line_size,
>>> ib.user_buffer, &ib.offset,
>>> &ib.buffer);
>>> ib.user_buffer = NULL;
>>> }
>>> --
>>> 2.12.0
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mesa-dev mailing list
>>> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
>
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
