On 03/03/17 11:53 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On 03/03/17 03:38 AM, Matt Turner wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> wrote: >>> P.S. It would be better to put the mesa-announce list only in Bcc on >>> this kind of e-mails, to prevent accidental followups there. Reply-to: >>> mesa-dev seems useless for that. >> >> GMail seems to ignore Reply-to. > > That would be shocking, though not entirely surprising. Anyway, the > issue with Reply-To isn't limited to gmail. Reply-To merely replaces the > original message's From address in the followup, any mailer will still > include other recipients (with reply-to-all or similar). > > >> Putting mesa-announce@ in Bcc seems like the wrong thing to do. > > Why?
Still curious why you think it's wrong. >> mesa-announce@ should just be moderated, like xorg-announce@ is. > > That probably makes sense. Adam, Daniel, is this implemented in > xorg-announce via the "emergency" option, or something else? Since I haven't heard back, I've enabled this option for the mesa-announce list. Let's see how it goes. > BTW, in that case it might be good to have more volunteers to process > the moderation queue. It's really easy with the listadmin tool. Any takers? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
