Right, the order can only be overwrite with GBM_BACKEND environment variable.

If we make the DRI backend also configurable by the conf file or give a 
"priority"
property to a backend in conf and assign a default priority to DRI backend, your
worry can be addressed.

Regards,
Qiang

________________________________________
From: Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net>
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 4:11:40 PM
To: Yu, Qiang
Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] gbm: add support for loading third-party backend

On 24/01/17 12:36 PM, Qiang Yu wrote:
> Third-party can put their backend to a directory configured with
> '--with-gbm-backenddir' and create a /etc/gbm.conf.d/*.conf file
> which contains the backend so file name to overwrite the default
> builtin DRI backend.
>
> The /etc/gbm.conf.d/*.conf will be sorted and the backends added
> will be tried one-by-one until one can successfully create a gbm
> device. The default DRI backend is tried at last.

If I understand correctly, any third-party backends will always take
priority over Mesa-internal backends. Is everyone okay with that? I'm a
little worried it might cause problems, but I can't come up with a
specific scenario now, and maybe it can be addressed if and when it
causes a problem in practice.


--
Earthling Michel Dänzer               |               http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast             |             Mesa and X developer
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to