On 24/01/17 12:36 PM, Qiang Yu wrote: > Third-party can put their backend to a directory configured with > '--with-gbm-backenddir' and create a /etc/gbm.conf.d/*.conf file > which contains the backend so file name to overwrite the default > builtin DRI backend. > > The /etc/gbm.conf.d/*.conf will be sorted and the backends added > will be tried one-by-one until one can successfully create a gbm > device. The default DRI backend is tried at last.
If I understand correctly, any third-party backends will always take priority over Mesa-internal backends. Is everyone okay with that? I'm a little worried it might cause problems, but I can't come up with a specific scenario now, and maybe it can be addressed if and when it causes a problem in practice. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
