On 16 January 2017 at 19:50, Ilia Mirkin <imir...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > What's the problem with using GALLIUM_DRIVER=softpipe / > GALLIUM_DRIVER=llvmpipe to select between them? > Will work, but has the "update existing users" drawback. Afaict neither scons nor autotools uses such approach, so I'd rather keep things symmetrical, where possible.
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Zhen Wu <wuz...@jidemail.com> wrote: >> Thank you for your review. Emil. It sounds like renaming swrast to softpipe >> is not a good idea, Inspired by your second question, perhaps a new >> MESA_ENABLE_LLVMPIPE would allow us to maintain backward compatibility and >> keep the ability to switch between softpipe/llvmpipe. How does this sound? >> I'm fine with MESA_ENABLE_LLVMPIPE. It will make the use of LLVM opt-in (i.e. existing users will just work) plus the build glue should be less. Thanks Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
