This patch and 5-9 are Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net>
If others think the "unified" approach is nicer, I'll rebase on top and we shouldn't need any nir_opt_algebraic.py changes since the syntax won't change. On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:41 AM, Timothy Arceri < timothy.arc...@collabora.com> wrote: > --- > src/compiler/nir/nir_algebraic.py | 5 ++++- > src/compiler/nir/nir_search.c | 3 +++ > src/compiler/nir/nir_search.h | 8 ++++++++ > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/compiler/nir/nir_algebraic.py b/src/compiler/nir/nir_ > algebraic.py > index 19ac6ee..b0fa9e7 100644 > --- a/src/compiler/nir/nir_algebraic.py > +++ b/src/compiler/nir/nir_algebraic.py > @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ static const ${val.c_type} ${val.name} = { > ${'true' if val.inexact else 'false'}, > nir_op_${val.opcode}, > { ${', '.join(src.c_ptr for src in val.sources)} }, > + ${val.cond if val.cond else 'NULL'}, > % endif > };""") > > @@ -185,7 +186,8 @@ class Variable(Value): > elif self.required_type == 'float': > return "nir_type_float" > > -_opcode_re = re.compile(r"(?P<inexact>~)?(?P<opcode>\w+)(?:@(?P<bits>\d+) > )?") > +_opcode_re = re.compile(r"(?P<inexact>~)?(?P<opcode>\w+)(?:@(?P<bits>\d+) > )?" > + r"(?P<cond>\([^\)]+\))?") > > class Expression(Value): > def __init__(self, expr, name_base, varset): > @@ -198,6 +200,7 @@ class Expression(Value): > self.opcode = m.group('opcode') > self.bit_size = int(m.group('bits')) if m.group('bits') else 0 > self.inexact = m.group('inexact') is not None > + self.cond = m.group('cond') > self.sources = [ Value.create(src, "{0}_{1}".format(name_base, i), > varset) > for (i, src) in enumerate(expr[1:]) ] > > diff --git a/src/compiler/nir/nir_search.c b/src/compiler/nir/nir_search.c > index cc17642..0d08614 100644 > --- a/src/compiler/nir/nir_search.c > +++ b/src/compiler/nir/nir_search.c > @@ -264,6 +264,9 @@ static bool > match_expression(const nir_search_expression *expr, nir_alu_instr *instr, > unsigned num_components, struct match_state *state) > { > + if (expr->cond && !expr->cond(instr)) > + return false; > + > if (instr->op != expr->opcode) > return false; > > diff --git a/src/compiler/nir/nir_search.h b/src/compiler/nir/nir_search.h > index 357509a..004b61d 100644 > --- a/src/compiler/nir/nir_search.h > +++ b/src/compiler/nir/nir_search.h > @@ -102,6 +102,14 @@ typedef struct { > > nir_op opcode; > const nir_search_value *srcs[4]; > + > + /** Optional condition fxn ptr > + * > + * This allows additional constraints on expression matching, it is > + * typically used to match an expressions uses such as the number of > times > + * the expression is used, and whether its used by an if. > + */ > + bool (*cond)(nir_alu_instr *instr); > } nir_search_expression; > > NIR_DEFINE_CAST(nir_search_value_as_variable, nir_search_value, > -- > 2.9.3 > > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev >
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev