On 28 October 2016 at 20:55, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 28 October 2016 at 19:18, Lionel Landwerlin > <lionel.g.landwer...@intel.com> wrote: >> On 28/10/16 19:12, Emil Velikov wrote: >>> >>> From: Emil Velikov <emil.veli...@collabora.com> >>> >>> There is nothing in here that would require it. >>> >>> Cc: mesa-sta...@lists.freedesktop.org >>> Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwer...@intel.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.veli...@collabora.com> >>> --- >>> Not sure why we got that dependency in the first place, Lionel ? >> >> >> Some of the Makefile's content ends up in the header (the last echo line of >> this patch). >> If someone changes that, it's nice not to have to cleanup all the intel >> directory >> > Valid point. At the same time, this applies to every rule [we have in > mesa] and we don't bother anywhere else. > Upon some testing/thinking I think we should nuke it.
Reason being that as one runs ./configure the Makefile is generated. Thus the files will be generated regardless if a) we're a release tarball where the files are already present and b) we do (or don't) have the tool to regenerate them to begin with. -Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
