The CCS calculations in ISL are already correct for 1-D and 3-D CCS
surfaces since they have exactly the same layout as 2-D array surfaces (at
least on Sky Lake). The only problem was that we weren't passing in the
right dimensionality and we weren't passing in the depth.
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net>
---
src/intel/isl/isl.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/intel/isl/isl.c b/src/intel/isl/isl.c
index 578c0e7..d0c5a0c 100644
--- a/src/intel/isl/isl.c
+++ b/src/intel/isl/isl.c
@@ -1492,11 +1492,11 @@ isl_surf_get_ccs_surf(const struct isl_device *dev,
}
isl_surf_init(dev, ccs_surf,
- .dim = ISL_SURF_DIM_2D,
+ .dim = surf->dim,
.format = ccs_format,
.width = surf->logical_level0_px.width,
.height = surf->logical_level0_px.height,
- .depth = 1,
+ .depth = surf->logical_level0_px.depth,
.levels = surf->levels,
.array_len = surf->logical_level0_px.array_len,
.samples = 1,
--
2.5.0.400.gff86faf
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
