On 10/21/2016 12:51 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Tapani Pälli <tapani.pa...@intel.com> wrote:
On 10/20/2016 09:24 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Tapani Pälli <tapani.pa...@intel.com>
wrote:
On 10/20/2016 06:55 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
The latest branch:
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~mareko/mesa/log/?h=glsl-alloc-rework2
It contains:
- all review comments resolved
- commits from Tapani's jenkins branch (fixes for glsl, nir, i965)
My updated patches are also on the list if you wanna review them.
Since there are no other comments, it looks like it's ready to land.
i965 and Gallium were tested by Tapani and me, respectively. The
branch contains all fixes first, followed by the allocation changes.
I haven't had time for further testing but it would make sense to try
also
with some benchmarks and steam games on i965. JP recalled there was
something that got triggered by Manhattan earlier with his patches. I'll
try
to get this testing done tomorrow.
I suggest you put shaders from Manhattan into your shader-db, so that
you don't have to run the game under valgrind. Also in future, it's
better to use shader-db instead of running games for stuff like this.
Makes sense as ralloc is mostly used in compiler but I think some of those
rallocated structures get also accessed when app calls GL API. I'll run at
least gfxbench manually just as a paranoid check to see if there's anything.
About shader-db .. should we consider making a scripts folder there and
start sharing some? It's used for instruction count analysis, memory
analysis .. would be nice to have some sort of 'standard' skeleton scripts
for this which can be then modified for purposes.
Not sure what you mean. Our script for shader-db reporting is si-report.py.
I mean scripts for comparing runs. For example for compile time
performance one might use Eric Anholt's compare-perf but that requires
some additional scripts that print correct output from run. Or maybe for
leaks it would be interesting to have a comparison summary script of
memory leaks between runs? Current scripts seem to only report
instruction count difference between 2 runs?
I did run some valgrind comparisons with gfxbench4, your branch against
Mesa master. I did not spot anything obvious related to ralloc.
On i965 there's a huge load of invalid writes's and read's in general
but this happens on master as well so maybe these are not 'valid hits'.
There's also some leaks both with master and your branch but your branch
has less, so it seems to fix some things.
// Tapani
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
