On 13 September 2016 at 15:39, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12 September 2016 at 23:19, Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com> wrote:
> (More important) note: > Keeping the _eglLockDisplay() in the top level (EGL API) while the > unlock in the lower level (fooCommon) will come to bite us. We could > update the RETURN_EGL_ERROR and co + all the call sites yet it's not > something we have to do atm. > Actually, current code has a bunch of such bugs which this series addresses. Considering there's only a couple of those and they are pretty hard to hit I won't bother with respinning the patches. That is unless we want them for stable ? -Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
