Would it be better to use the new upstream version of eglext.h and add
the #includes, or to keep Mesa's existing eglext.h and add the missing
declarations for EGL_KHR_debug?
-Kyle
On 09/09/2016 03:31 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 8 September 2016 at 18:46, Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com> wrote:
From: Kyle Brenneman <kbrenne...@nvidia.com>
Updated eglext.h to revision 32074 from the Khronos repository.
Added two #includes to egltypedefs.h. Both were in the previous version
of eglext.h but not in the new one.
-#include <EGL/eglmesaext.h>
-#include <EGL/eglextchromium.h>
-
AFAICT neither of these was in the upstream eglext.h, ever. Then again
we must upstreaming/standardise the remaining extensions, since
removing this hunk will break applications.
Most/all companies working on mesa are members of Khronos so it
shouldn't be that hard to get things sorted :-)
NACK on this hunk - please keep it as-is for the time being.
-Emil
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
