We're not doing layered blits yet are we? Perhaps this can wait until then?
On Aug 31, 2016 9:06 AM, "Topi Pohjolainen" <topi.pohjolai...@intel.com>
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Topi Pohjolainen <topi.pohjolai...@intel.com>
> ---
> src/intel/blorp/blorp_blit.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/intel/blorp/blorp_blit.c b/src/intel/blorp/blorp_blit.c
> index 170c381..026061b 100644
> --- a/src/intel/blorp/blorp_blit.c
> +++ b/src/intel/blorp/blorp_blit.c
> @@ -1271,9 +1271,6 @@ static void
> surf_convert_to_single_slice(const struct isl_device *isl_dev,
> struct brw_blorp_surface_info *info)
> {
> - /* This only makes sense for a single level and array slice */
> - assert(info->view.levels == 1 && info->view.array_len == 1);
> -
> /* Just bail if we have nothing to do. */
> if (info->surf.dim == ISL_SURF_DIM_2D &&
> info->view.base_level == 0 && info->view.base_array_layer == 0 &&
> --
> 2.5.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
>
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
