On 31 August 2016 at 13:40, Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 31, 2016 5:02 AM, "Michel Dänzer" <mic...@daenzer.net> wrote: >> >> On 30/08/16 06:51 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: >> > >> > If we don't care about memory usage, let's use my allocator. If we do, >> > let's import jemalloc into the Mesa tree and use it for ralloc. >> >> Instead of importing jemalloc into Mesa, could we use the shared >> libjemalloc.so.1? > > No idea. It exports malloc/free/etc, but "nm" says "there are no > symbols". Perhaps they can only be dlsym'd. > If we opt for jemalloc I'm in favour of using the shared one.
Re: symbols visibility - dlsym and (should) nm do the same thing. Here is how I check things: $ nm -CD --defined-only /usr/lib/libjemalloc.so 0000000000008470 T aligned_alloc 00000000002402a1 B __bss_start 00000000000084e0 T calloc ... -Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
