On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 03:11:06PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> ---
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c
> b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c
> index 8c63aa6..1911eef 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c
> @@ -3204,7 +3204,8 @@ intel_miptree_get_aux_isl_surf(struct brw_context *brw,
> } else if (mt->fast_clear_state != INTEL_FAST_CLEAR_STATE_NO_MCS) {
> *usage = ISL_AUX_USAGE_CCS_D;
> } else {
> - unreachable("Invalid MCS miptree");
> + *usage = ISL_AUX_USAGE_NONE;
I'm guessing you'd like to call intel_miptree_get_aux_isl_surf()
unconditionally in one of the following patches? After reading them quite a
bit this is still not obvious to me, and I think some rational is needed in
the commit message.
> + return;
> }
>
> /* Figure out the format and tiling of the auxiliary surface */
> --
> 2.5.0.400.gff86faf
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
