On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 05:37:22PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> The alignment we use doesn't matter (see the comment) but it should at
> least be an alignment we can represent with the enums.
This patch is,
Reviewed-by: Nanley Chery <nanley.g.ch...@intel.com>
> ---
> src/intel/isl/isl_surface_state.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/intel/isl/isl_surface_state.c
> b/src/intel/isl/isl_surface_state.c
> index bfd4b65..1d354f3 100644
> --- a/src/intel/isl/isl_surface_state.c
> +++ b/src/intel/isl/isl_surface_state.c
> @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ get_image_alignment(const struct isl_surf *surf)
> * true alignment is likely outside the enum range of HALIGN* and
> * VALIGN*.
> */
> - return isl_extent3d(0, 0, 0);
> + return isl_extent3d(4, 4, 1);
> } else {
> /* In Skylake, RENDER_SUFFACE_STATE.SurfaceVerticalAlignment is in
> units
> * of surface elements (not pixels nor samples). For compressed
> formats,
> --
> 2.5.0.400.gff86faf
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
