On 06/29/2016 06:02 PM, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Am 29.06.2016 um 01:52 schrieb Brian Paul:
Since only the src box can have negative dims for flipping, just
comparing the src/dst box sizes is enough to detect flips.
---
src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_surface.c | 20 ++++++++------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_surface.c
b/src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_surface.c
index 8d22bcf..e2229bc 100644
--- a/src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_surface.c
+++ b/src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_surface.c
@@ -701,21 +701,20 @@ util_can_blit_via_copy_region(const struct pipe_blit_info
*blit)
return FALSE;
}
- /* No masks, no filtering, no scissor. */
+ /* No masks, no filtering, no scissor, no blending */
if ((blit->mask & mask) != mask ||
blit->filter != PIPE_TEX_FILTER_NEAREST ||
- blit->scissor_enable) {
+ blit->scissor_enable ||
+ blit->alpha_blend) {
return FALSE;
}
- /* No flipping. */
- if (blit->src.box.width < 0 ||
- blit->src.box.height < 0 ||
- blit->src.box.depth < 0) {
- return FALSE;
- }
+ /* Only the src box can have negative dims for flipping */
+ assert(blit->dst.box.width >= 1);
+ assert(blit->dst.box.height >= 1);
+ assert(blit->dst.box.depth >= 1);
- /* No scaling. */
+ /* No scaling or flipping */
if (blit->src.box.width != blit->dst.box.width ||
blit->src.box.height != blit->dst.box.height ||
blit->src.box.depth != blit->dst.box.depth) {
@@ -736,9 +735,6 @@ util_can_blit_via_copy_region(const struct pipe_blit_info
*blit)
return FALSE;
}
- if (blit->alpha_blend)
- return FALSE;
-
return TRUE;
}
Now that you've simplified this, it looks to me like it should also
check for the new num_window_rectangle blit property.
Yes, I'll do that in a follow-on commit.
But in any case
this isn't your fault, for 1-3:
Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <srol...@vmware.com>
Thanks.
-Brian
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev