On 02/29/2016 04:34 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
We removed NV_vertex_program and NV_fragment_program{,_option} in 2012 yet we
continue finding more pieces of them years later. Last year we discussed
removing some remaining bits of NV_fragment_program_option that were used by
a broken Viewperf11 test [1]. Hopefully it's been long enough and we can strip
out the rest of the condition code support from Mesa IR.
I'd say go for it, Matt.
We run some Viewperf tests in house for regression testing, but we don't
run the Catia-03 tests (3,4,8) which use the NV extensions.
I haven't seen any bug reports from people trying to run Viewperf on
Mesa drivers either. I've documented the reasons why Viewperf is broken
and I don't think we can be expected to work around all the Viewperf
defects.
I did a quick pass over your patch series and it looks OK to me.
Acked-by: Brian Paul <bri...@vmware.com>
-Brian
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
