On Monday, February 29, 2016 3:34:34 PM PST Matt Turner wrote:
> We removed NV_vertex_program and NV_fragment_program{,_option} in 2012 yet
we
> continue finding more pieces of them years later. Last year we discussed
> removing some remaining bits of NV_fragment_program_option that were used by
> a broken Viewperf11 test [1]. Hopefully it's been long enough and we can
strip
> out the rest of the condition code support from Mesa IR.
>
> If not... then I guess I can try to rebase that out of the series. I hope it
> doesn't come to that. I'd really like to replace Mesa IR with NIR. idr
> suggested a alternate plan that's making more and more sense to me though:
push
> Mesa IR down to just something i915 and r200 consume or get rid of it
entirely.
>
> That would require 1) a NIR -> Mesa IR translator (for i915 and r200)
> 2) changing the program parser to generate NIR
> 3) ...?
>
> And with Rob's work to bring NIR to Gallium (and probably some more), we can
> probably cut out Mesa IR -> TGSI as well.
>
>
> [1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2015-February/
077015.htmlSeries is: Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> I think that you should get an Ack from Brian or Roland, though.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
