On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On 22 January 2016 at 12:24, Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Emil,
>>
>> Do you have any comment on this series?
>>
> I was secretly hoping that you'll forget about this patch because...
>
>> Marek
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> From: Marek Olšák <marek.ol...@amd.com>
>>>
>>> This allows building VDPAU/OMX/VA drivers without OpenGL and its
>>> dependencies.
>>> ---
>>> configure.ac | 5 +++++
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
>>> index 8d19dab..04b5fd8 100644
>>> --- a/configure.ac
>>> +++ b/configure.ac
>>> @@ -2159,7 +2159,12 @@ gallium_require_drm_loader() {
>>> fi
>>> }
>>>
>>> +dnl This is for Glamor. Skip this if OpenGL is disabled.
>>> require_egl_drm() {
>>> + if test "x$enable_opengl" = xno; then
>>> + return 0
>>> + fi
>>> +
>>> case "$with_egl_platforms" in
>>> *drm*)
>>> ;;
> ... the hole idea of having this error out is a gross workaround imho.
> While I could not find anything concrete to point out initially seems
> like you have found it. And now we add a workaround on top of the
> workaround :-\
>
> Yes it is (very) unlikely that radeonsi GPUs will have 2d accel
> without glamor and yes it is required in those cases. But that does
> not mean that we must mandate egl+drm but recommend it ? After all one
> can have egl+wayland+radeonsi mesa (without egl+drm) on a xserver-less
> setup, can't they ?
I don't know what Wayland uses, but if it doesn't use egl+drm, that's fine.
We still have to require egl+drm for GLX/DRI support, so we can loosen
the requirement a little bit, but we can't remove it completely.
That's how I see it.
Marek
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
