On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Roland Scheidegger <srol...@vmware.com> wrote: >>> For the series (with the first point addressed either way,though a tgsi >>> exec implementation which should be trivial wouldn't hurt neither) >>> Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <srol...@vmware.com> >> >> Thanks! I'll do a patch for that shortly (tgsi_exec). Unfortunately I >> won't be able to enable the cap since it will still use gallivm by >> default for vertices. I have a gallivm implementation as well, but it >> hits asserts on LLVM 3.5. I'm pretty sure I tested it at one point or >> another, but it must have been on another box with a more recent LLVM. > > Ah right. f16 conversion is pretty annoying indeed, though I'd hope the > helpers for that should work. In any case, I only really suggested that > because I'd thought it would be trivial, so if it's not I don't consider > that important...
I'll send it out as a separate series, including my (semi?) broken gallivm impl and leave it to you to fix it if you care, or ignore if you don't. (I already have it, so might as well...) I understand neither how LLVM works, nor how gallivm uses LLVM, which isn't a great combination :) _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
