----- Original Message ----- > On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 09:39 -0600, Brian Paul wrote: > > Good question. I was thinking that the interleaved vs. > > non-interleaved paths could probably be merged with a little work. > > I > > don't remember the original reason for doing things as they are. > > I think it enabled an easier upload path within the > driver/state-tracker > -- memcpy a single range to a single VBO, rather than gathering. > Now that the upload is potentially code-generated, that may no longer > matter as much.
Yes, for user pointer arrays it still makes sense indeed. But for pure VBOs I don't think that detecting interleaved arrays matters. Jose _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
