On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 09:39 -0600, Brian Paul wrote: > Good question. I was thinking that the interleaved vs. > non-interleaved paths could probably be merged with a little work. I > don't remember the original reason for doing things as they are.
I think it enabled an easier upload path within the driver/state-tracker -- memcpy a single range to a single VBO, rather than gathering. Now that the upload is potentially code-generated, that may no longer matter as much. Keith _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
