I've re-posted the r600 patch to the list with the revised initialisation of "j", and also posted a patch for evergreen.
Jools On 4 April 2011 15:18, Henri Verbeet <hverb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 31 March 2011 18:37, Julian Adams <joo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 31 March 2011 12:07, Henri Verbeet <hverb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Evergreen probably needs the same fix. >> >> Yes, the matching function there looks similar. I can update it, but >> can't test it. >> > I can test that. > > On 31 March 2011 20:33, Jerome Glisse <j.gli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Using for(int loopcountuer;;) construct is a good thing it helps the >> compiler to make good decision but gcc is already good on its own to >> figure this kind of things by itself. > I have my doubts if that really makes much of a difference on any > half-decent compiler. Regardless, note that "j" isn't actually the > loop counter, but just a variable that has a (conditional) dependency > on it. > _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
