On 31 March 2011 18:37, Julian Adams <joo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 31 March 2011 12:07, Henri Verbeet <hverb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Evergreen probably needs the same fix. > > Yes, the matching function there looks similar. I can update it, but > can't test it. > I can test that.
On 31 March 2011 20:33, Jerome Glisse <j.gli...@gmail.com> wrote: > Using for(int loopcountuer;;) construct is a good thing it helps the > compiler to make good decision but gcc is already good on its own to > figure this kind of things by itself. I have my doubts if that really makes much of a difference on any half-decent compiler. Regardless, note that "j" isn't actually the loop counter, but just a variable that has a (conditional) dependency on it. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
