Guys, Please don't hijack threads
On 22 Apr 2010, at 06:48, An Yang wrote: > 在 2010-04-22四的 13:41 +0800，An Yang写道： >> 在 2010-04-21三的 21:09 -0700，Greg KH写道： >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:58:41AM +0800, An Yang wrote: >>> > > > yes, I'm one of them-:) >>> > > > But more stable more user, it's a good rule of any success products, >>> > > > no >>> > > > mater software or hardware, even none IT related products. >>> > > >>> > > Then under that rule, Linux would not be a success. I think you need to >>> > > rethink your "rules" :) >>> > >>> > yes, stable and update is conflict, what do I mean, meego need >>> > balance-:) >>> > I never said refusing updates, I just said 6 month is too short. >>> > >>> > I could not imaging if Intel release new cpu every 6 month, will Intel >>> > have today's achievements? >>> >>> Intel does release new cpus every 6 months, and it's one of the main >>> reason that Intel is so successful. >> maybe, I'm not sure, intel guys could answer you. >> but I know every new cpus keep compatible with i386 since i386 released, no >> mater the manufacture technics used and what new feature added. >> the major of IA32 is keep stable for more than 15 years. > I'm sorry, i386 was released at 1985, I still remember the feeling I did > touch the i386 computer, just like at yesterday-:) >> >> so if IA is the life of Intel, you can conclude stable is the life of Intel. >> >> And of cause, meege just 1.0, who knows the next version of meego should >> compatible with the it, I just hope keep compatible-:) >>> >>> >>> So again, I think you need to revisit your thinking :) >>> >>> good luck, >>> >>> greg k-h >> > > _______________________________________________ > MeeGo-dev mailing list > MeeGo-dev@meego.com > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev -- Glen Gray <sla...@slaine.org> _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
