Yes indeed!  Include us on the petition.
 
At this moment we are having major problems with the conversion from the
UB92 to the UB04.  The bottom line effect is that we are having major delays
in submission to the sundry payers and the AR Days are climbing.
 
Part of the problem is that at no time during the testing process of this
conversion were we told that the important functions of modifying the
patient's information on-line, aka "scrubbing", would no longer be available
to us because we are MAGIC 5.5 SR3, and not a higher release.  Our choices?
Upgrade to a higher 5.5 release. Upgrade to 5.6 SR1 or Wait until November
when the 5.6 SR2 software will be available for general release.  All
options require 90-120 days of printing the patient's information, making
the needed changes, reprinting... A slow manual process.  And no, the
necessary DTS's cannot be installed out of sequence.
 
Withholding a portion of  the monthly maintenance payments until the
problems are resolved seems a reasonable means of getting the point across. 
 
Doug Hiteshew, MT(ASCP)
Senior Systems Analyst
Johnson Memorial Hospital
Franklin, IN
V: 317-736-3397
F: 317-346-3011
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Susca, Rena [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 10:17 AM
To: meditech-l@MTUsers.com
Cc: Acabbo, Valerie; Wirth, Maureen; Rotman, Alyssa; Richard, Brian
Subject: [MEDITECH-L] FW: Buggy Meditech programming of DTS's


I agree 100%.  I can name off the top of my head about a dozen programming
errors in the last year alone that have cost us dearly, both financially and
to our users who lost functionality of a field, a routine, and sometimes,
the whole system.  They've overwritten customs with DTSes, made typos in
DTSes, forgotten to retranslate programs, forgotten to move in all parts of
a DTS, didn't toggle services and moved in Client Updates that required
administrative rights to run, which means our meager I.T. department had to
run an update on over 450 PCs for them to work at all.
 
I'm not sure what route would be best to take, but obviously, hitting the
wallet is always a strong incentive.  Just my 2 cents.
 
Rena H. Susca
Sr. Systems Analyst
Gaylord Hospital
Phone: (203) 949-2122
Fax: (203) 294-8780
 <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Charlie Downs
Posted At: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 8:44 AM
Posted To: Meditech List Serve
Conversation: [MEDITECH-L] Buggy Meditech programming of DTS's
Subject: [MEDITECH-L] Buggy Meditech programming of DTS's



I don't know about everyone else, but I feel that was as Meditech users,
really need to get Meditech to improve on their programming accuracy. I've
run into more and more programming problems that have totally unintended
consequences unrelated to the problems that they were supposed to fix. Below
is an e-mail that I sent to our VP of IT this morning. I would like to see
some discussion on the L as to how to go about getting Meditech to change.

Thanks, Charlie

   

     We had a huge problem which we discovered last week, but only realized
the

consequences this weekend from a DTS which Meditech moved to Live on
Thursday. Pharmacy

Issue #5294828 was a problem that one had to give a reason when
re-processing a billing

error when we should have not been prompted for a reason. For some reason,
this tied to the

drug dictionary where one had to give a reason when updating it. This was
totally unrelated

to billing, yet when they moved this to live, it not only caused Pyxis
billing to stop, but

each time an item was removed, it credited a previously removed item. When I
called on

Thursday, Meditech denied that this was what was causing my problem. I've
pasted what they

found was the problem below:

Rebhan,Maria (MEDITECH) - Jun 18, 2007 - 0948 EDT:  Brian, there is a
problemwith the DTS

we delivered.   It was patched correctly but, the code from it iswrong.
I've fixed this

Inhouse and will just need change control for TEST.  Tx

   If this issue would have been a billing issue, I would have tested it
thoroughly before

having them move it to live, but it was not a billing issue. I am seeing
more and more of

this that when Meditech moves a DTS to test or live, it has uninteded
consequences that are

often not noticed until we are live with it, because no amount of testing
will pick up an

unintended change entirely unrelated to the DTS. Another example is Pharmacy
Issue

#5237726. It was supposed to fix a problem with a field not defaulting from
the formulary

service when adding a new drug (FirstDataBank). After this was moved to
live, I noticed

that we could not look up drugs as we had before and instead had to use
extra keystrokes

for look-ups.

    The hours to correct all of the billing problems is huge. I strongly
feel that Meditech

needs to be held accountable for what I see as increasingly sloppy
programming. I would

like to see us file a formal complaint with Meditech over this issue since
this is one of

many times that I have seen this happen in pharmacy and cause huge problems.
Meditech does

not even have a Pyxis machine to test out the Pyxis fixes, and instead is
relying on the

users to test the fixes. In addition, they need to thorougly test other
programming changes

more thoroughly instead of using their customers as basically alpha test
sites.

Unfortunately, sometimes we only find out about these programming errors
after the fact,

which is not right.

    Hopefully, by filing a formal complaint, we can get their attention, but
I would hold

my breath. We had an interesting discussion at MUSE about how to get
Meditech to change

their business practices, and short of a large group of users agreeing to
withhold

maintenance payments, I don't see them changing. Perhaps it is time for
Meditech users to

band together and consider such action.

 

 

Charles Downs PharmD

Washington County Hospital

251 E. Antietam Street

Hagerstown, MD, 21740

301-790-8904

 

 


***** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***** This message contains confidential
information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not
the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this
e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received
this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. 
Our Mission is to preserve and enhance a person's health and function.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission message, together with any
other documents or attachments, is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain personal
information that is subject to confidential privacy regulations such as the
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). The
authorized recipient of this information is STRICTLY PROHIBITED from
disclosing this information to any other party unless required to do so by
law or regulation and is required to destroy the information after its
stated need has been fulfilled. If you are not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, saving, printing,
copying, or action taken in reliance on the contents of these documents of
this message, or any attachment, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the
original sender (only) immediately by telephone or by reply E-mail and
delete this message along with any attachments, from your computer. Thank
you. 

=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
To subscribe or unsubscribe to the meditech-l, visit 
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l_mtusers.com

To check the status of the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET

For help, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Please visit and add information to the MTUsers WikiPedia at MTUsers.NET/mwiki
______________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
meditech-l@MTUsers.com
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l_mtusers.com

Reply via email to