And it becomes even more cumbersome if you are using tech order entry.
They can enter in pending but cannot remove the pending.
And when an unverified user enters the order, how does the checking
pharmacist indicate it has been entered correctly? 
The pharmacist can't verify the order without removing the pending.
There is another step here and that is a "verified" pending status that
is not available.

Our techs need to be able to remove the "verified" pending so that they
can process these orders without the pharmacist needing to
confirm/verify the order a 2nd time.  When the pendings would be removed
to give the RX active status may be 2 or 3 days later.   You are not
going to have the original orders in front of you at that time in any
case to "verify" the order. Also, generally when the pending is removed
it is because it has met the qualifications of the pending comments.  So
rather than having to edit the pending comments, why don't they have a
function that you could use such as PCM (pending comments met) that when
answered Y would give the RX active status and when N would DC the
order.

We sent the documentation on all of the pending functionality to our
pharmacy staff and everyone agreed that it is too cumbersome and work
intensive to use and not one of our facilities will be implementing it
when we go live with 5.6 on the 24th pending despite the need for it.

A complete rethink and a complete look at functionality is required by
Meditech before this could be useable.  More flexability via access
dictionary and customer defined parameters in how it is used would also
satisfy different user's needs.

Those are my thoughts......and despite numberous conversations with
Meditech during the testing process, I have been unable to sway them at
this point.


Susan 

Susan Makara, B.Sc.(Pharm) 
Coordinator Pharmacy Information Systems  
Interior Health   2355 Acland Rd., Kelowna, B.C.  V1X 7X9 
* 250-491-6756     * [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Fax: 250-491-6710 

"Information for Live: Excellence in Service, Excellence in Information,
Excellence in Health"


-----Original Message-----
From: meditech-l@MTUsers.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 2:30 PM
To: Roger Beverly
Cc: meditech-l@MTUsers.com
Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] PHA MAGIC 5.6.1 PENDING orders functionality

Thank you! I do not feel like a fool now. It is very cumbersome. I have
reported this to our Meditech analyst for what it is worth. If I can get
a few people from different facilities to agree to add their 2 cents
worth I will even enter the enhancement request. It would be very
useful, but in its current state it is just another fancy internal
paperweight. If an order is entered into pending by a user able to enter
verified orders and then removed from pending by a user able to enter
verified orders, there should be no reason to further verify the order.
AND you should not have to go into the order and ENTER all the way down
to the last prompt on the page to remove something from pending. There
should be a function in PROCESS ORDERS to do this. Thanks Cindy

This e-mail message, including its attachments, is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or privileged
information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.


 

             "Roger Beverly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

 

             06/11/2007 05:31 AM
To 
 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

 
cc 
 
<meditech-l@MTUsers.com>

 
Subject 
 
RE: [MEDITECH-L] PHA MAGIC 5.6.1 PENDING orders functionality

 

 

 

 

 

 






We have been live with 5.6 for ~ 5 months, and pending works exactly as
you have described.  None of our pharmacist are willing to use it
because it is so cumbersome.  I think that is a shame, because I see a
real usefullness for it.  Also, if you are not using the standard labels
and mar formats, you will have to add the pending flags for them to
print on the label.  The quickest way I have found to remove the pending
status is through the VEC routine - then you can remove the pending flag
and verify in one action.

Roger Beverly, PharmD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-----Original Message-----
From: meditech-l@MTUsers.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 5:08 PM
To: meditech-l@MTUsers.com
Subject: [MEDITECH-L] PHA MAGIC 5.6.1 PENDING orders functionality


Has anyone who does not have eMAR or POM yet been able to make use of
the PENDING function. I just started testing 5.6.1 and I am a little
confused as this seems like it would be a very useful function, but it
seems very cumbersome. Has anyone found a way to "turn off" the  "enter
order as PENDING"
that pops up for every order?
Has anyone found a faster way to remove a PEND status from an order
other than the method I have had to use, which is:
Perform an EDIT on the PENDING order, enter all the way down to the
PENDING prompt, change the Y to a N and change comments.
After removing the PEND, you have to VERIFY the order.
It seems to me that there could be a shortcut function called RP (remove
pending) when just the PEND prompt and comments box would pop up to be
edited. It also seems to me that if an order was originally entered by a
user able to enter verified orders and then a pending is removed by a
user able to enter verified orders, it is redundant to go in and have to
VERIFY the order again.
Even without eMAR or POM in place this could be a very useful tool,
except that removing the PEND status requires so many steps.
I do hope I am missing something and that someone has a better method of
working this function - if so, please let me know. Thanks Cindy




This e-mail message, including its attachments, is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or privileged
information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
To subscribe or unsubscribe to the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

To check the status of the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

For help, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Visit the MTUsers WikiPedia at MTUsers.NET/mwiki
______________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
meditech-l@MTUsers.com
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l


Conway Medical Center Disclaimer
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the
message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you E2003-TEXT


=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
To subscribe or unsubscribe to the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

To check the status of the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

For help, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Visit the MTUsers WikiPedia at MTUsers.NET/mwiki
______________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
meditech-l@MTUsers.com
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l

=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
To subscribe or unsubscribe to the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

To check the status of the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

For help, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Visit the MTUsers WikiPedia at MTUsers.NET/mwiki
______________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
meditech-l@MTUsers.com
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l

Reply via email to