On 5 Feb 2013, at 15:15, Ruediger Rolf 
<rr...@uni-osnabrueck.de<mailto:rr...@uni-osnabrueck.de>> wrote:

Especially Teltek's Galicaster is an valid alternative to the reference Capture 
Agent as it has an open source license too and works on very similar hardware.

I'd agree with this statement. When we were looking at capture agents we either 
wanted an off the self product for simplicity or something we could customise 
to our environment. We ended up going for customisation and Galicaster vs the 
reference agent didn't even get off the paper stage. Galicaster was and is 
evolving so much more rapidly, it's a bit more user friendly to noobs and seems 
to have a much more active community.

That said I'm wondering how Teltek would feel about being the only future FOSS 
offering on the capture agent seen?


Stuart Phillipson | Media Technologies Coordinator

Room 1.023 Devonshire House
University of Manchester
Manchester
M13 9PL
United Kingdom

e-mail: 
stuart.phillip...@manchester.ac.uk<mailto:stuart.phillip...@manchester.ac.uk>
Phone: 016130 60478

_______________________________________________
Matterhorn mailing list
Matterhorn@opencastproject.org
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn


To unsubscribe please email
matterhorn-unsubscr...@opencastproject.org
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to