As far as I understand your proposal, big +1 on this from Berkeley. We
could really use this functionality.
Thanks!
Michelle
On 1/30/13 12:51 AM, Tobias Wunden wrote:
Looking at the current list of bugs in Jira, it becomes obvious that a number
of them is centered around archival. One problem is that the archive service,
unless correctly configured, will try to archive things that shouldn't be
archived, such as the files that have been copied to the streaming server
featuring an rtmp:// url. But to allow for retraction some elements--namely
those that represent distributions--have to be retained in the media package
even though their content is not subject to archival.
Then at the moment it is very difficult for the archive to figure out whether a
media package has been distributed, and if so, to which distribution channels.
In order to move Matterhorn towards a media management system it is an
indispensable feature to make this clearly determinable.
Another goal of this proposal is to unify the concept of distribution. In the
current situation Engage is handled quite differently than e.g. YouTube where
separate steps for copying and publishing to search have to be done. The goal
is to have a 1:1 relationship between a distribution channel, its distribution
service and associated workflow operation handler and the corresponding entry
in the media package.
PROBLEM
The reason for these problems is that we are currently using a concept called
"derived tracks" to detect distribution status, for example if there is a
track, that is derived from the source track (the ingested media), and whose url starts
with the download url, then we know that the media package has been distributed to the
download server. This is not ideal for many reasons, with the most prominent ones being:
- the download artifact may be used by different presentations of the
mediapackage, e. g. the Media Module, a video repository connected through
OAI-PMH metadata harvesting, RSS/ATOM feeds etc. So what does retracting this
mediapackage really mean, or what does it mean for the representations if the
media is removed from the download server?
- the admin ui that wants to provide the administrator with the link to the "final
product" (i. e. the representation of the media package on the Engage UI or on
YouTube) needs to have in depth knowledge about these representations, for example it
needs to know that youtube tracks have a URL starting with youtube.com, so it would
determine distribution status to youtube by going through the mediapackage, looking at
all tracks to find one with a matching url.
PROPOSED SOLUTION
We are proposing a solution to all these problems that allows Matterhorn to
indicate to the administrator which channels a certain MediaPackage has been
distributed to without the need for the admin ui to have knowledge about
specific track properties for a given distribution channel.
A new element is introduced to the Mediapackage called "<presentation>" that
identifies the distribution channel as well as the url that is used to consume the distributed
artifact. This url can point to e.g. a web page with the embedded video in case of channels
like Engage/Player or YouTube or a feed URL in case of an RSS feed.
Which elements have been actually used to make up a distribution and to keep
track of them in order to allow for retraction now lies completely whithin the
responsibility of the distribution channel. To support some simple data storage
right in the media package the new element features a simple key/value
dictionary. These key/value pairs may also be used to implement efficient
storage and retraction strategies.
<mediapackage>
...
<presentations>
<presentation id="p-1" channel="youtube">
<uri>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1R-jKKp3NA</uri>
<mimetype>text/html</mimetype>
<!-- the dictionary is freely managed by the distribution channel and may
take arbitrary key/value data -->
<dict>
<value key="access-token">D1R-jKKp3NA</value>
</dict>
</presentation>
<presentation id="p-2" channel="engage">
<uri>http://downloads.myinstitution.edu/engage/ui/watch.html?id=123123s</uri>
<mimetype>text/html</mimetype>
</presentation>
<presentation id="p-3" channel="feeds">
<uri>http://downloads.myinstitution.edu/feeds/entries/342345</uri>
<mimetype>application/rss+xml</mimetype>
</presentation>
</presentations>
--
</mediapackage>
By adding this element to a media package, it would immediately be obvious to
which channels it has been distributed to (and how it can be reached in that
channel), and rather than creating data structures in the mediapackage and
using those to derive the distribution status and guess the actual
representation, the entry points into consumption of the mediapackage are
clearly defined.
This change doesn't touch existing data structures and will therefore not
impact existing functionality. But it will allow us to close out all of the
remaining bugs that are related to archival and retraction.
Looking forward to your +/-1's and/or comments.
Tobias
_______________________________________________
Matterhorn mailing list
Matterhorn@opencastproject.org
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn
To unsubscribe please email
matterhorn-unsubscr...@opencastproject.org
_______________________________________________
--
Michelle Ziegmann PMP
Technical Project Manager
Educational Technology Services
University of California Berkeley
_______________________________________________
Matterhorn mailing list
Matterhorn@opencastproject.org
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn
To unsubscribe please email
matterhorn-unsubscr...@opencastproject.org
_______________________________________________
