Is there a simple way to fix the following problem? IP Masq was working
with Kali (a multi-user gaming network) for about one month, but then they
added some logic to watch for illegal use of their software and now it
doesn't. A description of the change from Kali support appears below:
> The problem is that it (IP MASQ) doesn't maintain a one-to-one
relationship
> for each
> client port and server port. That is, when you try to send a packet from
> Kali port 2213 to 205.244.188.24 it might select server port 1026 to send
> the packet from. Then you send again to 128.192.20.80 (using the
> same Kali
> port) and it selects port 1027 to send from. Packets coming in
> on 1026 and
> 1027 are both sent back to your Kali port as if they were the same. The
> problem is that the PC at 205.244.188.24 and the PC at
> 128.192.20.80 think
> you are 2 different users since you'te not using the same port. The code
> should always use the same server port for all sends from the same client
> port no matter what the destination is.
Regards,
--
John Lombardo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For daily digest info, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
