Another guess,
When you configure your kernal using the configuration utility, it asks you if you
wish to
configure your TCP/IP for use as a workstation or as a router. If your machine is
configured as a workstation,
then it is doing copys and checksums to optimize host performance. This is however a
waste on a machine that is forwarding most of its packets, and will reduce
performance........
Todd Bryant
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 9/2/98, at 6:49 PM, Sandy Coyne wrote:
>Okay, I said before that Socks5 fixed my problems with ICQ, but I've just
>stumbled on a problem and a reason for the problem, but no solution. I
>found that incoming connections, such as messages, time out with the
>message suggesting that the event be sent through the server. Doing that
>works, but I'd rather be able to have connections work properly. I noticed,
>as a probable reason for this behavior, that my friends out in the world
>see 10.0.0.1 as my current/last IP from within ICQ. This is the internal
>address of my masq box. For some reason ICQ reports this instead of the
>correct address, which would be the external address of the socks5/masq box.
>
>Has anyone else solved or even noticed this problem?
>
>Do you think this is a problem with ICQ or the socks5 server configuration?
>
>Is there anything that I can do to fix this so that socks5 will work so I
>don't have to ipportfw/ipautofw a range of ports?
>
>TIA,
>--
>Sandy Coyne, obviously "A day without sunshine is like
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] a day without orange juice"
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For daily digest info, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For daily digest info, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
