/* HINT: Search archives @ http://www.indyramp.com/masq/ before posting! */ Both the Boomerang (3C905) and the Cyclone (3C905b) work fine. Unlike 3c509s, they have the ability to share IRQs when in need besides providing a wider bandwidth. Since the availability of IRQs is such a big issue sometimes, I recommend using the 3C905s if more than 3 NICs are to be used in a MASQ box. > -----Original Message----- > From: Michele Nicosia [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 1999 12:49 PM > To: 'Sean A. Walberg' > Cc: 'Ross Brattain'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: [Masq] RE: [Masq] Re: [Masq] RE: [Masq] Re: [Masq] > Delaying eth1 initialization > > /* HINT: Search archives @ http://www.indyramp.com/masq/ before posting! > */ > > > > I'm talking about 3c509 (isa) card. For the 3c905 (pci) card i have not > tested yet. > The isa cards haev no possibilities to be recognized with 2.0.36 kernel > when more than three. > > Bye > > ---------- > > > _______________________________________________ > Masq maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Admin requests can be handled at http://www.indyramp.com/masq-list/ > or email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > PLEASE read the HOWTO and search the archives before posting. > You can start your search at http://www.indyramp.com/masq/ _______________________________________________ Masq maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Admin requests can be handled at http://www.indyramp.com/masq-list/ or email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] PLEASE read the HOWTO and search the archives before posting. You can start your search at http://www.indyramp.com/masq/
