Sartesian; As you well know, this is not a list which gives either "implicit" endorsement, or indeed any explicit endorsement - on the whole anyway - to any particular viewpoint. This is a rather capacious tent. If there was any such 'endorsement' it could only be gauged by an 'apparent' concensus to an expressed article/opinion. And how is that to be assessed? It may only express itself by a non-critique somehow - in other words silence. And then it may be that it simply bored people in the first place.
What exactly are you fishing for? Are you looking for a 'rise' or what? If you find the article so problematic do a better one, or at least point out its deficiencies. If you are overly bored with the level of discussion here...... What is a moderator's opinion to do with this? Is it 'fascist'? Is it somehow 'reactionary' - then one might expect moderators to react. While not of any particular novel newsworthy information, it is nothing terrible. Do you want the moderators to 'decide' what is Marxist-worthy or not? I do not recall this list was intended to form a party. So please - a superior analysis showing how this article "could do better" - would be constructive. H -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#35502): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/35502 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/111400808/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. -=-=- Group Owner: marxmail+ow...@groups.io Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
