sartesian wrote, > Tom's begins his answer with a denial of authenticity
I'm not going to play sartesian's back and forth "gotcha" game. You only get one chance to move the goalposts with me before I drop the good faith assumption. My comment about volume 3 was not to deny the "authenticity" of the text but only its comprehensibility in light of its incomplete status and the difficulty Engels would have faced editing it. Either you are deliberately mischaracterizing my answers or you are a poor reader of others' intentions with no self awareness of your deficit. Goodbye. Cheers, Tom Walker (Sandwichman) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#35060): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/35060 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/111037083/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. -=-=- Group Owner: marxmail+ow...@groups.io Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
