Dear colleagues,
the following paper is available for download. All the best,
Simone PanigadaPresident, Tethys Research Institute
Article title: ESTIMATING CETACEAN DENSITY AND ABUNDANCE IN THE CENTRAL AND 
WESTERN MEDITERRANEAN SEA THROUGH AERIAL SURVEYS: IMPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT
Article reference: DSRII4239
Journal title: Deep-Sea Research Part II
Corresponding author: Dr Simone Panigada
First author: Dr Simone Panigada
Final version published online: 22-Jun-2017
DOI information: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2017.04.018


AbstractSystematic, effective monitoring of animal population parameters 
underpins successful conservation strategy and wildlife management, but it is 
often neglected in many regions, including much of the Mediterranean Sea. 
Nonetheless, a series of systematic multispecies aerial surveys was carried out 
in the seas around Italy to gather important baseline information on cetacean 
occurrence, distribution and abundance. The monitored areas included the 
Pelagos Sanctuary, the Tyrrhenian Sea, portions of the Seas of Corsica and 
Sardinia, the Ionian Seas as well as the Gulf of Taranto. Overall, 
approximately 48,000 km were flown in either spring, summer and winter between 
2009–2014, covering an area of 444,621 km2. The most commonly observed species 
were the striped dolphin and the fin whale, with 975 and 83 recorded sightings, 
respectively. Other sighted cetacean species were the common bottlenose 
dolphin, the Risso's dolphin, the sperm whale, the pilot whale and the Cuvier's 
beaked whale. Uncorrected model- and design-based estimates of density and 
abundance for striped dolphins and fin whales were produced, resulting in a 
best estimate (model-based) of around 95,000 striped dolphins (CV=11.6%; 95% 
CI=92,900–120,300) occurring in the Pelagos Sanctuary, Central Tyrrhenian and 
Western Seas of Corsica and Sardinia combined area in summer 2010. Estimates 
were also obtained for each individual study region and year. An initial 
attempt to estimate perception bias for striped dolphins is also provided. The 
preferred summer 2010 uncorrected best estimate (design-based) for the same 
areas for fin whales was around 665 (CV=33.1%; 95% CI=350–1260). Estimates are 
also provided for the individual study regions and years. The results represent 
baseline data to develop efficient, long-term, systematic monitoring 
programmes, essential to evaluate trends, as required by a number of national 
and international frameworks, and stress the need to ensure that surveys are 
undertaken regularly and at a sufficient spatial scale. The management 
implications of the results are discussed also in light of a possible decline 
of fin whales abundance over the period from the mid-1990s to the present. 
Further work to understand changes in distribution and to allow for improved 
spatial models is emphasized.
https://authors.elsevier.com/a/1VG0F3Ruf11rIg

_______________________________________________
MARMAM mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/marmam

Reply via email to