According to Marco Moock via mailop <m...@dorfdsl.de>: >Am 16.03.2024 um 17:44:09 Uhr schrieb John Levine: > >> It appears that Marco Moock via mailop <m...@dorfdsl.de> said: >> >> But who will follow 13 years old standard... ;-) >> > >> >When Google and Co. make DKIM mandatory, this will be hard, because >> >those messages are likely to be rejected. >> >> Why do you imagine that Google is unable to read the specs? I know >> people at Google who work on this and they are quite aware of what >> the standards say. > >Do they violate the standards if they make a valid DKIM signature >required? >IIRC this is what they described for bulk senders.
They can make any rules they want. I would note that requring a valid DKIM signature is not the same thing as forbidding invalid DKIM signatures. Most mailing list mail I see has both. R's, John -- Regards, John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
